whorlsteam0

User Name: You need to be a registered (and logged in) user to view username.

Total Articles : 0

https://zoneenergy8.bravejournal.net/10-places-to-find-pragmatic

Study of Chinese Learners Pedagogical Choices in Korean In addition to learnerinternal factors CLKs awareness of their own resistance to change and the relationship advantages they had access to were crucial Researchers from TS ZL for example cited their relationships with their local professors as the primary reason for their pragmatic decision to avoid criticism of a strict professor see the example 2 This article reviews all local published practical research on Korean until 2020 It focuses on pragmatic fundamental topics like Discourse Construction Tests DCTs The discourse completion test DCT is an instrument that is widely used in pragmatic research It has numerous advantages but also some disadvantages For instance the DCT is unable to account for cultural and personal differences in communication Furthermore the DCT is susceptible to bias and could result in overgeneralizations This is why it should be analyzed carefully before using it for research or assessment purposes Despite its limitations the DCT can be a valuable instrument to study the relationship between prosody and information structure in nonnative speakers Its ability to use two or more stages to influence social variables related to politeness could be a benefit This feature can help researchers study the role of prosody in communication across different cultural contexts a key issue in crosscultural pragmatics In the field of linguistics DCT is among the most effective tools used to study the behavior of communication learners It can be used to investigate various aspects including the manner of speaking turn taking and lexical choice It can also be used to determine the phonological difficulty of learners speaking A recent study used an DCT to assess EFL students refusal skills Participants were presented with a range of scenarios to choose from and were then asked to select the appropriate response The authors found the DCT to be more efficient than other methods of refusal like the use of a questionnaire or video recordings Researchers cautioned however that the DCT should be employed with caution They also recommended using other data collection methods DCTs are usually developed with specific linguistic criteria in mind such as content and form These criteria are based on intuition and are based on the assumptions of the test designers They are not necessarily correct and they could be misleading about the way ELF learners actually resist requests in realworld interaction This issue calls for further research on alternative methods of measuring refusal competence In a recent study DCT responses to student requests via email were compared to the responses of an oral DCT The results revealed that DCTs preferred more direct and conventionallyindirect request forms and used more hints than email data Metapragmatic Questionnaires MQs This study investigated Chinese learners pragmatic choices when it comes to using Korean through a variety of tools that were tested including Discourse Completion Tasks DCTs Metapragmatic Questionnaires Refusal Interviews RIs Participants were 46 CLKs of intermediate or higher ability who responded to DCTs and MQs They were also asked to reflect on their evaluation and refusal responses in RIs The results revealed that CLKs often chose to defy native Korean pragmatism norms Their decisions were influenced primarily by four factors their personalities and multilingual identities their ongoing life histories as well as their relational affordances These findings have implications for pedagogy for L2 Korean assessment and teaching First the MQ data were examined to identify the participants pragmatic choices The data was categorized according Ishihara 2010s definition of pragmatic resistance Then we compared the choices with their linguistic performance using DCTs to determine if they were indicative of a pragmatic resistance Additionally the participants were asked to explain their decision to use pragmatic language in a specific scenario The results of the MQs and DCTs were then analysed using descriptive statistics and Ztests It was found that the CLKs often resorted to the use of euphemistic phrases such as sorry and thank you This was likely due to their lack of experience with the target language which resulted in an inadequate knowledge of korea pragmatic norms The results showed that the CLKs preferences for either converging to L1 norms or diverging from both L1 and L2 pragmatic norms differed based on the DCT situations For example in Situation 3 and 12 the CLKs preferred to diverge from both L1 as well as L2 pragmatic norms whereas in Situation 14 they favored a convergence to L1 norms The RIs revealed that CLKs knew about their logical resistance to every DCT situation The RIs were conducted onetoone within two days after the participants had completed the MQs The RIs were recorded and transcribing and then coded by two independent coders The coding process was iterative with the coders rereading and discussing each transcript The coding results are then compared with the original RI transcripts to determine whether they accurately portrayed the underlying behavior Interviews for refusal The central issue in research on pragmatics is Why do certain learners choose not to accept nativespeaker norms Recent research sought to answer this question by using several experimental tools including DCTs MQs and RIs Participants comprised 46 CLKs and 44 CNSs from five Korean Universities They were asked to complete the DCTs in their first language and to complete the MQs either in their L1 or L2 Then they were invited to attend a RI where they were asked consider their responses to the DCT situations The results showed that on average the CLKs disapproved of the pragmatic norms of native speakers in more than 40 of their responses They did this even though they could produce patterns that closely resembled natives They were aware of their practical resistance They attributed their choice to learnerinternal variables such as their personality and multilingual identities They also referred external factors such as relational benefits For instance they outlined how their relationships with professors helped facilitate an easier performance with respect to the linguistic and intercultural standards of their university However the interviewees also expressed concerns about the social pressures and consequences that they could be subjected to if they strayed from their social norms They were concerned that their native interlocutors might view them as foreigners and think they were unintelligent This was a concern similar to the concerns voiced by Brown 2013 and Ishihara 2009 These findings suggest that native speakers pragmatic norms arent the norm for Korean learners They may remain useful as a model for official Korean proficiency tests Future researchers should reassess the usefulness of these tests in different contexts and in particular situations This will allow them to better understand the effect of different cultures on the behavior of students and classroom interactions of students from L2 Moreover this will help educators develop more effective methodologies to teach and test the koreas pragmatics Seukhoon Paul Choi principal advisor at Stratways Group in Seoul is a geopolitical risk consulting Case Studies The case study method is a method that employs intensive participantcentered research to study a specific subject It is a method that utilizes multiple data sources to back up the findings such as interviews observations documents and artifacts This kind of research is ideal for studying complicated or unique subjects which are difficult to assess using other methods In a case study the first step is to define both the subject and the objectives of the study This will help determine which aspects of the subject are important to study and which could be left out It is also beneficial to read the research to gain a broad understanding of the subject and put the issue within a larger theoretical framework This case study was based on an open source platform that is the KMMLU leaderboard 50 and its benchmarks that are specific to Korea HyperCLOVA X and LDCCSolar figure 1 below The results of this study showed that L2 Korean learners were extremely susceptible to the influence of native models They were more likely to pick incorrect answers that were literal interpretations This was a deviation from the correct pragmatic inference They also exhibited an unnatural tendency to include their own text or garbage to their responses further reducing their quality of response Furthermore the participants of this study were L2 Korean learners who had reached level 4 on the Test of Proficiency in Korean TOPIK in their second or third year at university and were aiming for level 6 in their next attempt They were asked to answer questions regarding their WTCSPCC as well as comprehension and pragmatic awareness 프라그마틱 무료 슬롯버프 were presented with two hypothetical situations which involved interactions with their counterparts and asked to choose one of the strategies below to use when making demands They were then asked to provide the reasoning behind their choice Most of the participants attributed their pragmatism to their personalities TS for instance claimed that she was difficult to approach and refused to inquire about the health of her coworker when they were working at a high rate even though she believed native Koreans would